The Grey Defining Natural History
Natural history can be defined in many ways. It could be the development of a disease or bacteria, the study of natural objects or, a treatise on some aspect of nature. The Grey provides a prime example how humans affect the natural state of an ecosystem. The Grey is a movie about an oil company in Alaska flying men to go home for vacation. These men end up in a gruesome plane crash. Seven of the men survive including a skilled survivalist. On their journey home, they face rough weather and are being hunted by a pack of wolves. This movie provides information on how to survive a plane crash and the natural elements of Alaska. Alaska is known as the last frontier because it has not been overexploited like the
…show more content…
An oil company came into Alaska and hired a sniper to kill any wolves that attempt to kill the workers. Due to the oil company arriving in Alaska resulted in habitat loss for all the animals in that area. This affects wildlife’s hunting grounds, homes, and food supply. The hired sniper which is Ottway kills the wolves that are hunting to survive. This sniper studies the natural history of wolves. Throughout the movie, he releases details pertaining to wolves’ keystone niches and territorial habits. Due to this company now placed in Alaska, the wolves are now limited. The sniper is also killing a keystone species. Alaska is full of wildlife and in order to have a balanced ecosystem, wolves are required. Wolves help regulate populations of smaller predators and prey. Regulating the smaller predator and prey population allows plants to grow and their roots prevent erosion around streams and fields. When wolves are not present in a habitat prey increases and overgrazing occurs. When wolves kill their prey the remains of the carcass fill the ground full of nutrients. Wolves even affect fish populations. Wolves are included in the trophic cascade phenomenon. Wolf populations have a huge effect on other species populations and …show more content…
The oil company went to Alaska for oil that is not a controlled substance. The oil company will take as much oil out of the land as they want. The presence of the refinery and the workers has caused the wolves to hunt unlikely prey, which would be the workers. These wolves are shot and killed because they are following their niche and hunting for survival. The wolves are going to continue being killed if they hunt the workers and it is not going to change because the company is bringing in revenue for Alaska. The oil refinery leads to roads being built for transportation along with the logging companies. These roads cause habitat fragmentation. Animals are killed on these roads and they create isolation of ecosystems. Eventually, Alaska is going to be filled with roads like the rest of the United States. When ecosystems become isolated, animal biodiversity decreases due to less breeding options and lead to habitat loss. The oil refinery created an edge effect. The environment directly by the refinery had limited biodiversity unlike the forest surrounding it. When the airplane crashed in the movie in the middle of the tundra it changed its natural environment. The wolves did not have to hunt for the food because there were dead bodies everywhere. The plane crash also polluted this habitat. The fuel from the plane dripped into the soil along with other chemicals held in the motor of the plane. Debris from the plane is
For one, by 1980, wolves doubled to 50. By then it was apparent, ‘balance of nature’ seems to be the force that guides nature. This shows that wolves should be introduced because they are needed for balance
One of the last of the world’s true wilderness, the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge is “one of the largest sanctuaries for Arctic animals, (where)… it is a vital birthing ground for polar bears, grizzlies, Arctic wolves, caribou, and the endangered shaggy ox” (Document E). By drilling for oil on this land, we would potentially endanger the wildlife and the
The wolves prey on elk , which consume plants. When wolves are not present in the ecosystem , elk have no concern about being preyed on. Therefore, they have time to graze on the surrounding trees and plants. Constantly , the native plants and trees have suffered from the over attention from the elk and their growth has been stunted. Some trees that have had this happen to them are cottonwoods, willows, and aspen trees, when wolves are in the environment. On the other hand, elk are cautious about where they eat. They no longer eat in the open , where wolves are able to hunt them. They find food in the thicker brush too be hidden. The trees in turn , are able to grow back to their original size and
Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a very controversial topic. On one end you have the people who want to drill for oil to help out our economy, and on the other end there are the environmentalists and the Alaskan natives who do not want their land destroyed. Our economy needs help; oil prices keep rising, gas prices have reached an all time high, and America is depending too much on foreign trade. Drilling for oil in Alaska will solve these problems. There are ways of drilling without disturbing the environment and keeping the animals in their original habitat.
Drilling oil in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) is a serious issue for environmentalists and for the future of the United States. Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge be opened to oil drilling? This paper will debate whether or not we should allow Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to be opened to oil drilling. This will also show the impact it has on the environment, and I will show a critical analysis of the current issue of whether or not to drill.
In “Scared to Death” by Ed Yong and Sharon Levy’s “Wolf Family Values,” we read about the need to protect the population of wolves in North America. These two articles have very different ways to go about this. Ed Yong talks about the wolf effects on elk as well as the rest of the environment. Levy’s approach is about wolf social structure and how it is impacted by hunting. Both of these make some valid points on why more conservation efforts should be made; however, I believe Ed Yong made the stronger case.
The purpose of writing the article Wolf Wars was to inform the reader about new situations in the west. The reason is to inform the reader of what problems wolves have been causing. In the article, the Author explains of how wolves became endangered and then flourished once more.
population and other things within the valley. The wolves did not have an easy life due to the
I am taking a class called global environmental issues and heard about how reintroduction of wolves has had very positive impact in Yellowstone, but we did not go much deeper than just stating so.
The Arctic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR) is a beautiful 19.6 million acre coastal plain, and is located in the Northeastern part of Alaska. ANWR is home to numerous species of wildlife and one of the largest untapped oil preserves in the United States. There is an immense debate between the opposing environmentalists and the politicians who want to drill for oil on a section of ANWR, which is only 1.8% of the refuge. Environmentalists who oppose drilling for oil in Alaska say the wildlife and the native populations are threatened by drilling for oil in ANWR, even though most of the natives are strongly in favor of drilling. ANWR could save the US from having to import $800 billion worth
Without the proper knowledge needed to understand how the wolf works, the creature is inaccurately shown as a wild, vicious killer. As Mowat progresses through his research he learns about the wolves hunting abilities and begins to acquire new information and states,” I could hardly believe that the all-powerful and intelligent wolf would limit his predation on the caribou herds to culling the sick and infirm when he could presumably, take his choice of the fattest and most succulent individuals” (Mowat 126). The way the government and people portray wolves as mindless killers is not only false, but it is far from the truth. Wolves are instead intelligent creatures that have the ability to choose and pick the right kill. Also, as Mowat researches their eating habits he finds that “the wolves of Wolf House Bay, and, by inference at least, all the Barren Land wolves who were raising families outside the summer caribou range, were living largely, on mice” (Mowat 107). During the summer the wolves weren’t even that cause of the deaths of caribou. Instead they found new resources to live off of when the caribou leave so they can continue to survive. This information is an exact contrast to the
I recently read an article in Scientific American (May 2001) titled “the arctic oil & wildlife refuge.” The article addresses the issue of whether or not science has the ability to clarify the potential economic benefits and the ecological risks of drilling into the nation’s last great coastal wilderness preserve. What I began to wonder after reading the article is, if we humans should continue our scientific and technological petroleum endeavors even though we are causing irreversible harm to our earth. My feeling is that we should not drill in Alaska’s Arctic.
Predators play a fundamental role in maintaining ecosystem health. Research strongly supports the contributions of wolves in particular to the functioning and stability
The author knows that human error is a true obstacle in science and just because some credible sources say something is true, does not make it 100% accurate. She asks the question, “Does it really matter?” that the wolves are not as big of an influence as everyone thinks it is. She realizes the importance of the wolves of Yellowstone and the effect it had on the public. It has raised interest in wildlife and gave attention to efforts to conserve wildlife. She says this story also distracts from some of the bigger problems at Yellowstone.
Wolf introduction has happened to Yellowstone National Park. It has improved the ecosystem drastically, balancing it, and allowing some species to thrive and others to arrive. Yellowstone National Park has improved, and with that, more tourists tour there, giving the government more income. Vegetation has gone back to thriving, and birds that rely on it have thrived, too. However, Taxpayers lose a lot of money from wolf introduction. Some people think that wolves kill livestock, making human life there harder. But the beneficial effects outweigh the harmful effects of wolf introduction.